Read Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the

Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration

4.9/5 (30663 ratings)

Description:Excerpt from Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and Great Britain Concluded at Washington February 20, 1892; For the Determination of Questions Between the Two Governments Concerning TheNow I would ask the attention of the Tribunal while I submit what is the true construction of that article. It turns upon the last clause of that article, beginning with the words If in the Case. I think my learned friends will probably agree that the earlier part is not material or not directly material to the purposes upon which we now ale engaged. If in the Case submitted to the Arbitrators either party shall have specified or alluded to any report or document in its own exclusive possession, without annexing a copy, such party shall be bound if the other party thinks proper to apply for it, to furnish that party with a copy thereof. Now I agree that so far as I have read this clause of article 4, it does point to applying only to docu men ts in the exclusive possession of one party, and referred to by that party.But it is the second branch of this clause upon which I mainly rely. It then proceeds, and either party may call upon the other, through the Arbitrators, to produce the originals or certified copies of any papers adduced as evidence, giving in each instance notice thereof within 30 days after delivery of the Case. The distinction, therefore, between these two branches of this rule is, I submit to the Tribunal, obvious. The first part deals with a document exclusively in the possession of one of the parties, and referred to by such one of the parties in the Case submitted. The second branch deals with a much wider, and much more important matter. It deals with this, that if there exist in the possession of either party the original documents which are important in the elucidation of the truth and in arrivin g at a proper conclusion upon the facts, then the party who desires to rely upon such document shall not be driven to rely upon uncertain, unsafe, secondary eviden cc, or partial evidence, or extracts from the document in question; but that the Tribunal shall have the means of assisting that party in putting before the Tribunal the actual, authentic docu ment itself, or an authentic copy of the document itself. Surely that is the reason of the thing.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the. To get started finding Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Pages: —

Format: PDF, EPUB & Kindle Edition

Publisher: —

Release: —

ISBN: 1528287533

Description: Excerpt from Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and Great Britain Concluded at Washington February 20, 1892; For the Determination of Questions Between the Two Governments Concerning TheNow I would ask the attention of the Tribunal while I submit what is the true construction of that article. It turns upon the last clause of that article, beginning with the words If in the Case. I think my learned friends will probably agree that the earlier part is not material or not directly material to the purposes upon which we now ale engaged. If in the Case submitted to the Arbitrators either party shall have specified or alluded to any report or document in its own exclusive possession, without annexing a copy, such party shall be bound if the other party thinks proper to apply for it, to furnish that party with a copy thereof. Now I agree that so far as I have read this clause of article 4, it does point to applying only to docu men ts in the exclusive possession of one party, and referred to by that party.But it is the second branch of this clause upon which I mainly rely. It then proceeds, and either party may call upon the other, through the Arbitrators, to produce the originals or certified copies of any papers adduced as evidence, giving in each instance notice thereof within 30 days after delivery of the Case. The distinction, therefore, between these two branches of this rule is, I submit to the Tribunal, obvious. The first part deals with a document exclusively in the possession of one of the parties, and referred to by such one of the parties in the Case submitted. The second branch deals with a much wider, and much more important matter. It deals with this, that if there exist in the possession of either party the original documents which are important in the elucidation of the truth and in arrivin g at a proper conclusion upon the facts, then the party who desires to rely upon such document shall not be driven to rely upon uncertain, unsafe, secondary eviden cc, or partial evidence, or extracts from the document in question; but that the Tribunal shall have the means of assisting that party in putting before the Tribunal the actual, authentic docu ment itself, or an authentic copy of the document itself. Surely that is the reason of the thing.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the. To get started finding Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Special Offer | $0.00

Special Offer! | $0.00

Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the

Fur Seal Arbitration, Vol. 11: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and ... the Determination of Questions Between the

More Books

Opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan at the Conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, Constituted by the Treaty of February 29, 1892, between Her Britannic 1893 [Leather Bound]

Opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan at the Conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, Constituted by the Treaty of February 29, 1892, between Her Britannic 1893 [Leather Bound]

Opinions Of Mr. Justice Harlan At The Conference In Paris Of The Bering Sea Tribunal Of Arbitration, Constituted By The Treaty Of February 29, 1892, ... Majesty And The United States Of America

Opinions Of Mr. Justice Harlan At The Conference In Paris Of The Bering Sea Tribunal Of Arbitration, Constituted By The Treaty Of February 29, 1892, ... Majesty And The United States Of America

Opinion of Senator Morgan at the conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, constituted by the treaty of February 29, 1892, between Her Britannic Majesty and the Un [Leather Bound]

Opinion of Senator Morgan at the conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, constituted by the treaty of February 29, 1892, between Her Britannic Majesty and the Un [Leather Bound]

Opinions of Senator Morgan at the Conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration

Opinions of Senator Morgan at the Conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration

Opinions of Senator Morgan at the conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, constituted by the treaty of February 29, 1892, between Her Britannic Majesty and the United States of

Opinions of Senator Morgan at the conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, constituted by the treaty of February 29, 1892, between Her Britannic Majesty and the United States of

Opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan at the conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration constituted by the treaty of February 29 1892 between Her Britannic Majesty and the [Leather Bound]

Opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan at the conference in Paris of the Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration constituted by the treaty of February 29 1892 between Her Britannic Majesty and the [Leather Bound]

Fur seal abitration. v.13-14. Volume v.13-14 1895 [Leather Bound]

Fur seal abitration. v.13-14. Volume v.13-14 1895 [Leather Bound]

Fur seal abitration. v.8 (App.I-II) Gr. Britain Counter Case. Volume v.8 (App.I-II) Gr. Britain Counter Case 1895 [Leather Bound]

Fur seal abitration. v.8 (App.I-II) Gr. Britain Counter Case. Volume v.8 (App.I-II) Gr. Britain Counter Case 1895 [Leather Bound]

The Behring Sea Arbitration: Letters to the Times by Its Special Correspondent : Together with the Award

The Behring Sea Arbitration: Letters to the Times by Its Special Correspondent : Together with the Award